Taichung Police Deputy Chief Removed After Refusing DUI Test, Faces Harsh Probe

Recently, a deputy chief investigator of the Taichung City Criminal Police Corps was stopped on suspicion of driving under the influence and refused to undergo an alcohol test, sparking intense controversy. The officer’s conduct not only violated traffic safety regulations but also breached police professional ethics. The Taichung City Criminal Police Corps launched an investigation and decided to remove the officer from his rank and reassign him to a non‑supervisory position. The incident has drawn widespread attention, with many commenting on its seriousness and the subsequent handling.

The deputy chief investigator in question, surnamed Wang, had been a prominent member of the Taichung City Criminal Police Corps, handling investigations and inquiries across numerous cases. He served in this role for many years and earned a number of honors and awards. However, he was recently stopped on suspicion of drunk driving. According to reporters, Deputy Chief Investigator Wang was halted by police in Hsinchu County shortly after 2 a.m. on suspicion of driving under the influence. He was asked to submit to an alcohol test, which he refused. This refusal violated traffic safety laws as well as the professional and moral standards expected of police officers.

In response to the incident, the Taichung City Criminal Police Corps convened an emergency meeting in the morning and resolved to strip Wang of his rank and reassign him to a non‑supervisory post. The decision underscores the Corps’ assessment of the incident’s gravity and its commitment to addressing it. According to the Corps, the measure aims to preserve the integrity and authority of the police force and to safeguard the overall image and reputation of the service.

The case has attracted considerable public attention and discussion. Many observers consider Wang’s behavior inappropriate, asserting that he should not have violated traffic safety regulations or police professional conduct. Others view the episode as indicative of internal management and supervisory shortcomings within the police force, calling for a thorough investigation and appropriate handling. There are also calls that police officers suspected of drunk driving should face severe and stringent penalties, with strict punishment for violations of traffic laws and professional ethics.

The handling of the case by the Taichung City Criminal Police Corps has also drawn comments from other police agencies and units. Numerous individuals see the incident as a reflection of internal management and oversight issues that require in‑depth investigation and resolution. Many believe the matter constitutes an important case that the police force must treat seriously and address decisively. Again, there are suggestions that any police officer suspected of driving under the influence should be dealt with harshly and strictly, imposing severe sanctions for breaching traffic safety statutes and professional standards.

Finally, the incident has sparked discussion across various sectors of society. Many maintain that Wang’s conduct was improper and that he should not have contravened traffic safety regulations or police ethics. The event is also seen as a manifestation of internal management and supervision problems within the police, necessitating thorough investigation and corrective action. Repeatedly, commentators advocate that police officers alleged to have driven under the influence should be subjected to the toughest possible penalties, with rigorous enforcement of both traffic and professional conduct rules.

Source: Central News Agency.