Nuclear Restart Crisis Hinder Taiwan's Low-Carbon AI and Energy Transition

The National Anti-Nuclear Action Platform, in its recently released argumentation for the "No-Nuclear Home" referendum, reiterated that the restart of nuclear power involves multiple complex issues, including nuclear safety, waste management, and energy transition. The platform argued that the pro-nuclear stance simplifies the intricate energy choices into the slogan "nuclear power means development" and called on voters to cast a "disagree" vote. It noted that Taiwan is currently in a critical phase of energy structure adjustment, and prioritizing nuclear power would hinder the effective promotion of a low-carbon, sustainable energy transition, potentially impeding the development of green and smart energy.

In the history of Taiwan's energy policy, nuclear power has been a focal point of controversy since the 1990s. Since 2008, the government has proposed production suspension plans multiple times and held a national referendum in 2020, ultimately securing public support for the "No-Nuclear Home" slogan. However, with rising energy demand and fluctuating energy prices, some political parties and corporations have once again advocated for the restart of nuclear power to ensure the stability of electricity supply. In its argumentation, the platform pointed out that while nuclear power can provide baseload electricity, its high construction costs, long-term waste management burdens, and the risks of nuclear accidents are factors that decision-makers must carefully consider.

The platform also mentioned that Taiwan is actively promoting the artificial intelligence (AI) industry, aiming to drive economic growth through technological innovation. The argument that nuclear power ensures development ignores the AI industry's need for clean, renewable energy. Relying on nuclear power as the primary energy source would make it difficult to meet the AI sector's demand for low-carbon, low-emission electricity, thereby affecting Taiwan's competitive advantage in the global AI arena. In contrast, developing renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power, coupled with smart grid and energy storage technologies, better aligns with the energy characteristics of the AI industry and enhances overall energy security.

Furthermore, the platform emphasized that the decision to restart nuclear power is not merely an energy issue but a matter of social and environmental responsibility. The problem of long-term nuclear waste disposal remains unresolved, and the potential impacts of a nuclear accident are incalculable. Viewing nuclear power as the sole path to development would weaken the government's ability to balance energy diversification, environmental protection, and public safety. The platform urged the public to fully understand the long-term risks and costs associated with nuclear power before voting, warning against ignoring long-term social responsibilities for short-term economic gains.

In summary, the argumentation by the National Anti-Nuclear Action Platform reminds voters that the restart of nuclear power should not be reduced to the singular viewpoint that "nuclear power means development." Energy transition requires a diversified strategy that balances safety, environment, economy, and technological development. If Taiwan can formulate a more comprehensive and forward-looking energy policy based on citizen participation and scientific assessment, it will help promote the upgrading of its economic structure and sustainable development. (Source: CNA)